Catcher comparison of Martin vs Y. Molina
PlayerGPAttempts% CSInn/SBFld %Martin15412333.315.3.988Molina107305437.4.991
In what areas was Martin better? He did have only 5 passed balls (1 every 250 innings) vs. Molina's 7 (1 every 123 innings), but Martin had a much better pitching staff to work with. On the flip side, Martin's errors were highest in
(
Read more... )
Even that said, despite the massive difference in innings caught, Martin's and Molina's RAR are almost identical (38 for Molina to Martin's 37), and that's a difference that speaks worlds to Martin.
On the flip side, and to support your argument, RAA2 (the fielding stat that is determined by how a pitching staff pitches) has Molina blowing Martin out of the water with a 21 to Martin's 13.
It's certain that Martin might not have been exactly deserving of the GG, but I don't think Molina necessarily was either. I would put forward that CS% is not a very good indicator for a player with such limited time played. Martin's high RAR and much, much higher RFg trumps his only relatively, only very slightly low FP (a poor indicator of defensive ability anyway).
Molina put together an impressive season defensively especially considering he missed a third of it. But you're selling Molina much too high and selling Martin much too short.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment