So I've been reading about feminist criticism of Hamlet for my Lit Studies class. But what I'm interested in isn't so much the Hamlet stuff itself (although I'm sure we can all ruminate on Ophelia until the cows come home). What I'd really like to know more about is this
(
Read more... )
Of course, it could be both. If males have had a dominant social position in most of human and human ancestor societies for long enough... which may or may not be the case... then the greater survivorship of empathic females may have lead evolutionarily to their genes surviving more, and therefore that trait being selected for.
I kind of doubt it, though. Especially since we know next to nothing about most of human history... and there's some evidence that matriarchal and goddess-centered societies were more prevalent before the rise of monotheism, (perhaps before men figured out they were involved in conception?). The physical anthropology supporting any kind of patriarchal or male-dominated society among early hominids is sketchy (and I think it's mostly assumption and projection), simply because evidence of any kind is scarce. Add in the fact that things like heartiness, cleverness, and attractiveness would have far greater effects on someone's survival... and I doubt it's heavily evolutionarily weighted. But who knows.
Reply
As for the brain chemistry ... well, I just don't know. I'll have to poke my finger around in there and see if I've got this connector thingy ... ;)
Reply
Leave a comment