Choices...
Okay so I have been creating some mock-itineraries in my head. What I have realized is that we actually have very little time to do many things. I could pack as much as I can into the two weeks that you guys will be there, or I can limit what we do.
There are various opportunity costs for each. One being how much we actually do/see. Another being the amount we move around. With less to do it can be more relaxing/less hectic. But if you guys don't mind running around all over than we would be on the move....augh this is a bad explanation.
Basically the question is would you rather do more and always be on the move, or would you rather do less and have more time to chill in particular places? If we do less then we wont be going to Hiroshima and Miyajima. It would most likely just be Kyoto (plus Tokyo and the area we live in).
Let me know.
There are various opportunity costs for each. One being how much we actually do/see. Another being the amount we move around. With less to do it can be more relaxing/less hectic. But if you guys don't mind running around all over than we would be on the move....augh this is a bad explanation.
Basically the question is would you rather do more and always be on the move, or would you rather do less and have more time to chill in particular places? If we do less then we wont be going to Hiroshima and Miyajima. It would most likely just be Kyoto (plus Tokyo and the area we live in).
Let me know.