Yet Another Friday Poll!

Dec 03, 2010 16:16

Poll This poll wants to date you.

poll

Leave a comment

Comments 19

scifantasy December 3 2010, 21:25:00 UTC
Is this my fault? 'Cause that would be kinda cool.

Reply

badmagic December 3 2010, 21:33:53 UTC
Darn, is it that obvious? Totally, and thanks for the inspiration.

Reply

scifantasy December 3 2010, 21:34:54 UTC
You're welcome. It's a good question, and at least one commenter on mine has suggested a term perhaps worth adding to the lexicon: "Friends with feelings."

Reply

starfyrone December 4 2010, 10:51:12 UTC
In another similar discussion someone suggested "Romantic Friends" as another marker.

Can we get a ISO committee started to standardize these terms?

Reply


vvalkyri December 3 2010, 21:31:09 UTC
not-dating and Not Dating are different things, as is sortof-not-dating.

I'm more likely to use the term Involved. The terms with hyphens above indicate a something that for whatever reason falls short of Acknowledged Relationship.

I don't see a lot of useful times for "we're dating" 'cause /that/ means entirely too many different things to different people.

I've only had a couple people ever who I spend whole weekends with; they've been called Boyfriend.

and I've had 5ish hours of sleep in the last 56.

Reply

badmagic December 3 2010, 21:36:38 UTC
Does sortof-not-dating fall further short of an acknowledged relationship than not-dating or less far? I'm not being snarky; I'd actually like to know.

Reply

vvalkyri December 3 2010, 21:55:05 UTC
i think sortofnotdating . . . hm. feels more fluid. flip. i'm not sure i ever use not-dating as distinguished from sortof-not-dating (which roughly translates to 'don't freaking know but something is going on). I guess not-dating would . .

urgh.

seriously, that 5 hrs sleep thing.

25 documents to .pdf starting after a meeintg in a few minuts

Reply

selki December 9 2010, 13:05:40 UTC
5 hours of sleep out of 56 sounds a bit low.

Reply


thelongshot December 3 2010, 23:46:19 UTC
I'm trying to figure out how a sexual relationship CAN'T be intimate. The two seem to go hand-in-hand...

Reply

scifantasy December 4 2010, 00:04:02 UTC
I guess it depends what definitions we use. (Which brings us back to square one.)

Reply

starfyrone December 4 2010, 00:47:19 UTC
The stereotypical "one night stand" rarely includes actual intimacy.

Matter of fact as demonstrated here including intimacy in a one night stand appears to be _very_ unwelcome.

Reply

selki December 9 2010, 13:06:10 UTC
physical v. emotional intimacy.

Reply


starfyrone December 4 2010, 00:17:52 UTC
To me, a "Date" unadorned by adverbs, adjectives, footnotes, or diagrams indicates person A has interest in the possibility of starting a relationship with one or more components of intimacy, romance, and sex, and wishes to discuss the possibility at some length absent other significant distractions with person B, and person B has agreed to at least contemplate the possibility. The purpose of the date is to explore the potential combination and intensities of the aforementioned components ( ... )

Reply


free_of_whip December 4 2010, 04:41:44 UTC
Thank you for reminding me that I am very happy not to have been dating (or just dating, or not dating, or not-dating, or DATING dating) for a very long time!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up