Your application said: (unedited for grammar, spelling or stupid)
Im not letting my character be slashed up. I hate that kind of sic rp, when men in canon are made gay by pervents and have sex in anises. My character is good and hes strait in love with his wife.Now, Gay bear not mock the bad spelling or grammar. Gay bear sense that mun is not
(
Read more... )
It unfortunately goes both ways.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've seen a number of instances myself of players massacring a character's canon personality just to get some buttsecks. Not that there's anything wrong with wanting to play slash, but if you have to butcher your character to make it plausible, why do it?
But Captain Jack Harkness...
...was first introduced to us standing in a WWII officer's club complimenting one of his fellow (male) officers on his ass...
...a few episodes later, kissed The Doctor full on the lips as a way of saying goodbye...
...has been caught, a few times, by his Torchwood associates, en flagrante delicto with another of their associates, a man named Ianto ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Honestly? I do think making a character who's canonically had relationships with women 100& gay is pretty stupid, generally. I much prefer repressed/unnoticed bisexuality, if you want to ship them with someone of the same gender. Which doesn't invalidate all those OTHER relationships, but that's a whole other rant.
Reply
It's not even canonically just had relationships with women - it's giving them attraction to men that has never been seen, expressed, hinted at or suggested by anything in the story. That's inventing something that was not intended or was never there to begin with. This is why I dislike shipping in the first place and most fanfic. That's a rant for another time though.
Reply
Leave a comment