So, this article sparked my interest a little bit, so last night and this morning I did some research on the subject of suspended animation, and discovered among other things two important problems with this article.
1) Even though the article is not lying, the experiment they are describing took place over a year ago, not last month.
2) The dogs, were never "clinically dead." They were put in a suspended animation-like state where there breathing, heart rate, and body temperature were radically reduced. The reason they were filed with that salt solution is that the solution is still capable of carrying oxygen, however very little, which is theoretically necessary for inducing suspended animation. But I would have to go into too much detail here to explain the science of it. It's fascinating work though.
Bottom line, the dogs were never really dead, and are therefore not zombies. Sorry to burst you bubble man.
Comments 7
Reply
2. they shouldn't be doing expreiments on those poor dogs.
3. I will kill any zombie I see.
Reply
Reply
This is the beginning...
Reply
1) Even though the article is not lying, the experiment they are describing took place over a year ago, not last month.
2) The dogs, were never "clinically dead." They were put in a suspended animation-like state where there breathing, heart rate, and body temperature were radically reduced. The reason they were filed with that salt solution is that the solution is still capable of carrying oxygen, however very little, which is theoretically necessary for inducing suspended animation. But I would have to go into too much detail here to explain the science of it. It's fascinating work though.
Bottom line, the dogs were never really dead, and are therefore not zombies. Sorry to burst you bubble man.
Reply
but i figured it was bullshit
Reply
2) The article is not really bullshit. If you just take out the claim that the dogs were "dead," then the article is completely truthful.
Reply
Leave a comment