Random article that struck me
The United States, in its capital, has many, many memorials. Some, like the Vietnam memorial, were controversial at the time but have since grown to be iconic.
What I was unaware of was that there is a small World War one memorial.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/09/world.war.one.memorial/index.html
Reading this, I'd support spending a couple million to make it into something real.
For those in other countries that participated in both WW1 and WW2 (under whatever name), is the first neglected in comparison to the second? It certainly seems that way in the United States.
Food for thought that struck me.
What I was unaware of was that there is a small World War one memorial.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/09/world.war.one.memorial/index.html
Reading this, I'd support spending a couple million to make it into something real.
For those in other countries that participated in both WW1 and WW2 (under whatever name), is the first neglected in comparison to the second? It certainly seems that way in the United States.
Food for thought that struck me.