A little bit more serious, now...

Apr 02, 2009 06:00

Oops, lost a couple of people off my friends' list with that last post. :)

On the other hand, I love how polite everyone is in the discussions, and I do appreciate it. Yesterday's post was pretty much off the cuff, based on some reading I've been doing lately, which in turn was triggered by my experience with the Lyrica.

Oh, look, more diet rambling. )

rant, diet, state of the me, deep thoughts, blah blah blah

Leave a comment

gargoyal3 April 2 2009, 18:29:25 UTC
People told me I should "be a model" in my early teens. I got sick and then grew like a weed, 5'9" and just over 100lbs :)

But it always made ME annoyed because I wasn't as strong as other kids. Couldn't run far, or lift stuff, or climb, because I had no muscle mass. Honestly, I would far rather be shorter and sturdier, so I could play more.

Which brings me to another point. Even model-shaped women are not culturally "rewarded" for being that size. I'm the national average height for MEN. So this makes me threatening to them. God forbid I wear HEELS! I'm not little and cute with giant boobies, so somehow I am also "not a woman". Awesome, thanks.

And clothes? ALL sleeves are 3/4 length in my universe. Most pants don't go near my ankles. Size small shirts reach someplace around my bellybutton.

So, screw it. I don't regret my recent gain of 10+ pounds. In an archeological sense, it makes me feel wealthy, that I can afford to eat that much :) I enjoy having arms, and thighs, for the first time in my life. They go nicely with the belly and flat, white-girl butt that I've always had. I'm no longer a 13 year old, now I am a WOMAN, and being one of those means you have body fat. No body fat = GIRL.

Reply

nicolaa5 April 2 2009, 22:55:35 UTC
I'm also 5'9"--but it's all in my legs. 34" inseam. It's starting to get a little better--I now have two stores where I can buy a limited selection of pants in my length, plus a third store where sometimes they just make them long enough, without going to Tall Girl.

I'm also a size 16 (although I was back down to a 14 before my Dad died and I got lazy with the eating). Honestly, I would not want to be much smaller than a 10. 12 would be about right. But to show you how weird sizes can be--my Mom wore a 10 most of her life; towards the end she was wearing 8s (more the sizes changing than her). Mom was 5'5 1/2" and never weighed much more than 125. I've got about 3 inches on her in height. When I was a size 12 (in university), I weighed 170. I now weigh a little under 200. That's a 75-lb weight difference, but I carry my weight so differently than she did that the clothing size difference is not nearly as much as might be expected.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up