I preface this by clarifying that I am relating ideas about "academic giftedness" and to a lesser extent "creative genius" as opposed to "physical giftedness" which is a whole 'nuther ballgame (and for which success is very much down to the luck of the draw).
I have done a lot of unpacking about "genius" and "giftedness" as they were labels I had
(
Read more... )
That P word, potential, can set her off in a rave; she was the one who pointed out to me that teachers never utter that word without following it with an insult or complaint. You simply never hear the P word without it being followed by "but "
P.S. Your description of "the gifted child" sounds VERY much like not just a gifted child but specifically a child with Aspergers syndrome or high functioning autism. I raised two of those. (I have three kids; two were labeled gifted for academic and one for her skills in the arts)
Reply
In the teacher training that I have done (particularly a teacher aide course I did it focused a lot on extending gifted children within the bounds of the normal work. Blooms Taxonomy for example can allow teachers to target questions to a child's level of ability so that a whole class can be working at different levels on the same material.... and there are a lot of these strategies around, but the teachers have to have the training and ability to pull it off.
When going through a box of my school work a few years ago I stumbled on essays written on such meta topics as why 'writing this essay isn't a good method of assessment' and numerous protests at being made to do busy work. I think that there are some schools where inconvenient children are being accommodated by the system, but it doesn't mean that the current system is the best way to help them flourish.
Reply
Leave a comment