Thank you for your suggestion! For now, we intend to keep reserves screened. We feel that our current method is more fair for potential players as a whole, as it cuts down on premature judgment of both reservers and any challengers that may apply. If this process does not work as intended, however, we will reconsider our screening policy for future app rounds!
Perhaps it's too much extra work, but I'd like to suggest that you guys make a game plurk account for announcements and such. In my experience, these help players meet and interact with each other more easily, as well as spreading the word when reserves and apps open.
For now, we intend to use the OOC community for all mod announcements. We would prefer not to encourage Plurk as being the sole method of OOC contact, as not every player has a plurk, and we don’t want them to feel as if they absolutely must have one in order to facilitate OOC relationships, hold discussions, or create CR.
If, in the future, game events necessitate a mod Plurk account, then we will reconsider our decision. Thank you for the suggestion!
so this is a suggestion for a tagging system? at another game i'm in, they have something implemented for the community board where players can tag themselves into posts they've commented to. it's a wicked great way of keeping track of things you've tagged for things like activity check and if you quickly want to look something up for later reference.
essentially you'd have two tags. for example, for kirk, he'd have james t. kirk for posts he's made on the main comm and c: james t. kirk for anything he's commented to.
Is it possible we could have the log format textbox on the log community profile? Or a link to the post it's in. Just for ease of c&ping into a new post without having to manually browse through the log comm to find it.
Comments 7
Reply
Reply
Reply
If, in the future, game events necessitate a mod Plurk account, then we will reconsider our decision. Thank you for the suggestion!
Reply
essentially you'd have two tags. for example, for kirk, he'd have james t. kirk for posts he's made on the main comm and c: james t. kirk for anything he's commented to.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment