Pretty Women
What can I say? I'm bored to death.
Askmen.com has some of the weirdest (or downright erroneous) rating systems on women. Well, the whole principle of rating women might be wrong, but that's another topic for another day.
When a rating system that has Pamela Anderson rated as a 99 on sexiness, you know something's wrong. Now I know it's an American website and it shares the same crooked views as everyone else in Hollywood, but perhaps they should tone down the bias. Just because the women has a sex tape out in the public... arg! (One would notice that Paris Hilton has a score of 84 for Sexiness - and 61 for Personality & Talent)
And being American and all, they have to exclude many Canadian actresses. How about Jennifer Finnigan? Caroline Dhavernas? I guess the only way to get into the database is to release sex tapes (Paris Hilton), walk around in skimpy clothing for a living (Adriana Lima, or any other models from Brazil, Czech, etc who's in either Sports Illustrated or Victoria Secret), or be in the American entertainment industry where there is some major exposure - and I'm not just talking about publicity-wise (Evangeline Lilly, Erica Durance, Sarah Carter). But then they also omit American-born actresses like Sarah Wayne Callies and Leighton Meester, so maybe they just skip random actresses in general.
Wow, I don't know what's worse: having a rating system on women, or complaining about a rating system on women.
PS. Jennifer Morrison does not deserve an 80 if Lindsay Lohan got an 83. And 78 for Samaire Armstrong while giving an 86 for Tara Reid? Have they even seen Entourage? Arg! At least they got Melissa Theuriau right. Whatever, it's one bias vs another.
PPS. It's interesting how Mischa Barton got a 0 because apparently she's still under 18.
1) That's just wrong (well, can't really be much worse than Fox, who hired her especially for a risqué role in The OC - then does the same with Willa Holland; ages 17 and 15 respectively at the time of hiring. Well, Fox ended the show anyways)
2) She's 20 now. Bad site maintenance.
Askmen.com has some of the weirdest (or downright erroneous) rating systems on women. Well, the whole principle of rating women might be wrong, but that's another topic for another day.
When a rating system that has Pamela Anderson rated as a 99 on sexiness, you know something's wrong. Now I know it's an American website and it shares the same crooked views as everyone else in Hollywood, but perhaps they should tone down the bias. Just because the women has a sex tape out in the public... arg! (One would notice that Paris Hilton has a score of 84 for Sexiness - and 61 for Personality & Talent)
And being American and all, they have to exclude many Canadian actresses. How about Jennifer Finnigan? Caroline Dhavernas? I guess the only way to get into the database is to release sex tapes (Paris Hilton), walk around in skimpy clothing for a living (Adriana Lima, or any other models from Brazil, Czech, etc who's in either Sports Illustrated or Victoria Secret), or be in the American entertainment industry where there is some major exposure - and I'm not just talking about publicity-wise (Evangeline Lilly, Erica Durance, Sarah Carter). But then they also omit American-born actresses like Sarah Wayne Callies and Leighton Meester, so maybe they just skip random actresses in general.
Wow, I don't know what's worse: having a rating system on women, or complaining about a rating system on women.
PS. Jennifer Morrison does not deserve an 80 if Lindsay Lohan got an 83. And 78 for Samaire Armstrong while giving an 86 for Tara Reid? Have they even seen Entourage? Arg! At least they got Melissa Theuriau right. Whatever, it's one bias vs another.
PPS. It's interesting how Mischa Barton got a 0 because apparently she's still under 18.
1) That's just wrong (well, can't really be much worse than Fox, who hired her especially for a risqué role in The OC - then does the same with Willa Holland; ages 17 and 15 respectively at the time of hiring. Well, Fox ended the show anyways)
2) She's 20 now. Bad site maintenance.