(no subject)

Jul 24, 2005 09:05

Question #107: Would you like to have your rate of physical aging slowed by thirty or so as to give you a life expectancy of about 2000 years?

I don't think so. My immediate family would die when I was a child. My nieces and nephews would die when I was an adolescent. My brother and sister's grandchildren would die when I was in high school.

I already feel strange that a lot of my friends are getting married and some of them having kids. Were I to live 2000 years and age proportionately, all my friends would age 30x faster and then move onto other things. This would be really depressing, seeing as I don't make friends that fast anyway.

I don't think I'd have a problem adjusting to many social changes that may occur, since if I say "Things were better when I was younger," that would mean a span of 500 years. The worst thing, probably, would be that I would just get bored. 80 years or so is enough to get bored of humans and earth and living. I wouldn't want to stick around for 2000.

This post marks the halfway point through D. Gregory Stock's Book of Questions! Knuck if you buck, y'all! And watch out for CONDI!






Previous post Next post
Up