Last night, I began three separate rants against David Friedman's racism, and gave up, because nearly every attempt would invoke Godwin's Law. But I mean, when someone thinks Larry Summers was on the money with his suspicion that the shortage of female engineers is an intrinsic biological problem, and James Watson was on the money with his
(
Read more... )
I can understand that she got offensive when her kid was deemed to be homophobic (might have been thoughtless, but that doesn't make him homophobic - just a bad judge of words); but I don't understand why she's defending JLC and ripping into zeborahnz
I concur on DF - he's in his sixties, in a position of priviledge, and all advice and requests to at least mend his manners even if he won't change his mind have perled off him in the past.
JLC is becoming more dogmatic and less pleasant as time goes by, to the point where I find it impossible to have a normal conversation with him - every time I disagree he reaches for one of two replies: 'oh, you dislike me anyway' (quickly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy!) and 'well, that's how I am, you just have to put up with it because I shall not amend my words to mean the same thing as everybody else means by them.'
Reply
(I don't know what to think. I was pretty left-wing when I was younger, and was assured I'd get more conservative as I got older. This does not seem to be remotely what's going on for me.)
We're going to have to disagree about the homophobia thing. Yes, the kid is thoughtless, but that's exactly part of what makes the situation so homophobic to me.
DF is a crackpot. Now he is holding forth on IQ with The Bell Curve as his source of reference. If I was trying to parody him, I couldn't have come up with that. It does put his fondness for Larry Summers and James Watson into perspective.
My personality flaw (I want to understand everything as much as possible) is really kicking in because I desperately want to understand how a human being can be like that.
Reply
Me either! I'm getting pretty extremist as I age. Of course, I'm not even 30 yet, but even so...
Reply
Thanks for putting me on your flist - I suspect I wasn't on because I joined alt.poly around the time you left - so I knew (from lurking) who you were and you had no clue who I was.
Reply
I think she believes that, by being too radical, I will inspire a counter-reaction that will be harmful to women's rights.
I don't think she's noticed that the harshest counter-reaction I've inspired has come from her.
I can understand both that point of view (I once somewhat sympathised with it) and that lack of perception (certainly when I'm angry I don't notice how much of a git I get). Neither thing is confined to discussions of privilege.
So while I'm angry at the attitudes being expressed I'm not angry at any individual in the thread.
Also, California! Hard to be angry today.
Reply
But, yes, yay! for California.
Reply
Leave a comment