I'll be graduating with a B.S. in Biology (math minor) next May, and am ultimately looking to do research in the science of aging (aka geroscience, biogerontology, longevity research).
I've checked out the Nathan Shock Centers in the Basic Biology of Aging (NSCs) as potential graduate schools. The thing is I have a real, real problem with personal
(
Read more... )
Like the person before me said, animal research is not as bad as people believe it can be. Rats and mice in laboratories actually live longer lives than they do in wild. Honestly, they are treated much much better than they are in the wild. However, i'm not trying to change your beliefs on the issue.
You will find it to be very difficult to not be involved with animals over the entirety of your research career, particularly in the biology side of aging. It's too complex of an issue to just focus on a cell line; cellular aging is a different process than the system.
My suggestions would be to find a specific disease process that you're interested in studying, this will open up your options. Also you will need to be creative with what type of programs you are looking at (you may be able to find something in nutrition or exercise physiology programs).
Reply
Worse case scenario I'd probably end up doing research with yeast.
Can you mentioned further exactly what kinds of experimentation is run on the animals. I have significantly less of an issue with the occasional blood or tissue harvesting than with traumatic injury microRNA studies (for example).
Reply
Reply
Ideally I'd like to work on organ model systems, but organ culture is still in its infancy. I've thought of going into the organ culture field, maybe I have to start tracking down these programs (along with the yeast-based labs).
Reply
I personally draw the line at collecting primary cells from animals for culture, but honestly you become very much desensitized to some of the things (but we don't do anything in my lab other than the sacrifice that is tricky).
Reply
Leave a comment