Leave a comment

applegoddess October 14 2007, 11:12:27 UTC
It's one thing to write half Dutch half English to a mixed audience, and it's another thing to have an all English site with all English-fluent readers who have no idea what the fuck you're talking about commenting in Tagalog. The whole damn website in English, all the comments in English, and someone posting in Chinese.

It's that kind of thing that's sort of bizarre and nonsensical because you'd think if everyone else commented in English and the whole article is English and the author is fluent in English, that you'd be posting in English, not only as a courtesy to the readers, but also to the author who more than likely doesn't know anything about that language.

So the question is, why fucking post in a language that you know the author probably will not be fluent in if you're posting for them to read, and perhaps, get your audience to indirectly read. You might as well just be spamming.

And if I could only use Esperanto, Perl and C++..or any combination of any of the three, I think I'd be blowing my brains out. I'm not particularly fond of any of them.

Reply

dwizzy October 14 2007, 12:04:24 UTC
Oh, I automatically dismiss cyrillic and asian comments as spam.

Sometimes, I see a French individual thinking French is a world language on the interwebs. Chinese? Why not. It is nonsensical, but the interwebs do not make any sense.

What's wrong with those three languages, apart from the fact I don't speak them?

Reply

applegoddess October 14 2007, 22:58:55 UTC
See? The problem is they're not always spam. It's just that you usually have no idea what they're talking about so the comment might as well be spam. Which is begging the question why the person even bothered to leave a comment in that language if they knew enough of the other to comprehend it enough to leave a relevant comment.

I just don't like Perl, I don't like C++, and I think Esperanto is useless. Just my two cents.

Reply

dwizzy October 15 2007, 07:21:48 UTC
how do you know they're not all spam? Do you take the effort of translating?

My first language after Basic was Perl, because everybody used it, websites used it and irssi used it. I was promised an army knife. PHP was not that popular then and I don't know if AppleScript existed.
C++... I don't know a real difference between C++ and C# or any alternative, it seemed the most widely accepted language.
Esperanto is useless because no one uses it, because people are creatures of habit and culture. The language is not sexy at all, has no romance and I doubt it could carry poetry. But it's so damn sexy if it comes to logic. It's easy!

So, what are your alternative languages?

Reply

applegoddess October 15 2007, 09:38:52 UTC
Some of them I can understand, and some I translate. They're usually not spam.

But there's a lot more to language than logic, so Esperanto sort of sucks. C++ is vastly different (although influences) C# etc., it's just that out of all the similar languages there are others I'd rather use (e.g. C# and Java over C++). As for Perl, I find myself liking Ruby more and more...and it's also currently the language du jour for so much thanks to rails and all. I don't really have anything /against/ Perl, it's just that right now I think I'd rather choose another language in place of Perl..just at the moment, not sure which one I'd choose because there's so much to consider.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up