multi-aterm, x-terminal-emulator alternatives and xfterm4

Jun 23, 2005 01:48

Debian has a concept of alternatives, where a capability is given a name, like X Terminal Emulator would be x-terminal-emulator and there may be several programs (like gnome-terminal, konsole, xterm, rxvt, aterm etc.) that provide the X Terminal Emulator capability. Each of these programs indicates that it Provides: x-terminal-emulator. In the ( Read more... )

tech, debian, linux, code

Leave a comment

deepix June 23 2005, 04:34:12 UTC
Ever since I started using multi-gnome-terminal, I have never bothered to look at alternatives. MGT rocks my socks!

Reply

appaji June 23 2005, 12:15:07 UTC
MGT is a memory hog, the logging buffers apart, even with unofficial patches it takes more than 250KB per tab, whereas konsole takes up only 8KB or so per tab. I don't run gnome at home because I have an old PIII-1GHz/128M-SDRAM/i810 machine that'll die under gnome. However, at work I use gnome-terminal.

Reply

deepix June 24 2005, 05:25:11 UTC
I run MGT on windowmaker - not GNOME. You cannot count only konsole for memory, I would start from all the bells and whistles that form the 'KDE foundation'. GTK2.x (that gnome-terminal uses) is not very slim on memory, either. ;-)

Mine is a P3 450 MHz/192M SDRAM machine at home. I run Woody on it.

Reply

appaji June 24 2005, 12:12:24 UTC
True :-). I was KDE user on Woody too, but primarily because Gnome was ugly in Woody. Thanks to cheaper and faster internet these days in India, I now use unstable. And XFCE 4.2.2 that was recently uploaded to unstable is visibly more faster than the one in sarge. Life is good :)

Reply

deepix June 25 2005, 06:15:00 UTC
Indeed. GNOME 1.x sucks. GNOME 1.x (alongwith GTK 1.x) is a prime example of 'programmer-oriented' program, with no aesthetic sense to boast about anywhere, IMHO.

(I am talking about the 'default' 'theme' here.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up