thought u were nuts but... ur theory makes tons of sense
anonymous
July 21 2007, 15:58:01 UTC
Thought you were nuts when I started reading this, having stumbled upon it looking for an article on that new book whose approximate title is "The End" by a Frenchman (Sam Bennett?). I have to say your reading of the "facts" or I should say: various stories distillable to some elements common (possibly based in some kernel of truth), and other elements that vary (probably the lies or bad memory possibly) is more compelling than either of my other 2 favorite theories: accidentally snorted heroin in the apartment thinking it was cocaine because Pamela may have told him that to avoid a fight; or the other theory: died in the toilet at the nightclub and was carried home by the drug dealers
( ... )
Re: thought u were nuts but... ur theory makes tons of sense
anonymous
July 23 2007, 21:41:37 UTC
Sorry-- this is just not reasonable and quite insulting to the French. To your credit, you point out that this is all just a theory, "another theory" at that..Well at least you think about something constructive.. don't mean to sound unkind, just a Devil's advocate
( ... )
Re: thought u were nuts but... ur theory makes tons of senseantispamnowJuly 24 2007, 12:02:03 UTC
1. It’s not that case. She doesn’t tell the same story differently each time, she tells very different stories - read the article. 2. Who told that Pam ever collected that money? Because of the will, she would have received money anyway (big money). 3. The publicists would always prefer the angle which gives striking headlines - a murder, for example. 4. Toluene is a new version without any evidence. Other smart alecks are speaking about heroin. However, that doesn’t change anything at all. There’s no reason to cover up such a death, for a junkie it’s almost natural. However, everything about Jim’s death was covered up: he was buried secretly, he was listed under a different name, his relatives weren’t informed, etc. - read the article. No one says that the French police “bought it off”; however, they could write what they were told by those who have power in their reports without any problems. As a result, total plausibility. 5. "Well trying to bury someone here in three days is hard enough, but in a foreign country?"There are no
( ... )
Re: thought u were nuts but... ur theory makes tons of sense
anonymous
May 9 2009, 22:41:27 UTC
Well if the bruise were indeed from a ressusitation attempt then that would mean he was still alive... IE heart beating.. for at least a little while after for a bruise to occur.
Reply
Reply
Reply
2. Who told that Pam ever collected that money? Because of the will, she would have received money anyway (big money).
3. The publicists would always prefer the angle which gives striking headlines - a murder, for example.
4. Toluene is a new version without any evidence. Other smart alecks are speaking about heroin. However, that doesn’t change anything at all. There’s no reason to cover up such a death, for a junkie it’s almost natural. However, everything about Jim’s death was covered up: he was buried secretly, he was listed under a different name, his relatives weren’t informed, etc. - read the article. No one says that the French police “bought it off”; however, they could write what they were told by those who have power in their reports without any problems.
As a result, total plausibility.
5.
"Well trying to bury someone here in three days is hard enough, but in a foreign country?"There are no ( ... )
Reply
Julie
Reply
Leave a comment