ETA: this was a gut reaction post, extreme perspective, explained in the comments. don't hate me.
I got this in my email this morning, from the local homeschool group:
ID State rep proposes financial benefits for parents that teach kindergarten at home.
Read more... )
I don't see anything wrong with governmental support for those who need it and stated so in my post. I really, truly don't. I don't know if we'd go on welfare in order to make it through a period of unemployment (mostly because David works for the government and there are provisions made for lay-offs and stuff), but I am grateful to know it's available. I completely agree with your demonizing of safety nets statement. A lot of conservatives out there drive me nuts because they have no concept of the world beyond their backdoor. These are, incidentally, usually the same who are 'militant fecundity' supporters, anti-pants, tell their girls they don't need college, and think doctors and lawyers and CEOs are over-educated and why can't we go back to the apprenticeship method of aquiring a highly-technical skill like our great-grandfathers?
I do have to add that it's been proven faith-based charities and other non-profits do greater good than any governmental program, from rehab to food pantries to childcare.
Also, I don't like the WARRIORS FOR CHRIST mentality. Did you know there are more examples of love, peace, and 'creating' (artisans, beauty, etc.) than there are warrior images in the Bible? I forget where I read that, but I thought that was interesting. I do know that in the Old Testament, when God was setting up the tribes in the desert and dividing the Israelites into different groups of organization, the artisans and skilled workers were number one, after the priests, and before the armies. It seems to me that creating and crafting and beauty and art are more pleasing to the Lord than armies and battles are.
We like pants very much.
Reply
Leave a comment