Leave a comment

Comments 9

wpadmirer December 5 2009, 16:44:39 UTC
WTF?! I just watched this and I'm all agog!

WP

Reply

ann_tara December 5 2009, 17:00:40 UTC
WTF?! I just watched this and I'm all agog!

*gack* There has to be more to it than meets the eye - right? Just. Has. To. Otherwise, I don't think they could keep the series going very long if they make one half of the buddy team a bad guy, especially this early in the series.

At least it's coming back in a month and we'll be put out of our misery one way or the other soon enough. *sigh*

Reply


ginzai December 5 2009, 17:36:09 UTC
Oooh, I missed the new ep last night but this gives me something to look forward to!

And the thing with Kate and Elizabeth sort of makes me smile since just last week I read a rant from someone about Neal being Peter and Elizabeth's kid and the lack of plausibility with that concept.

Reply

ann_tara December 5 2009, 17:55:27 UTC
And the thing with Kate and Elizabeth sort of makes me smile since just last week I read a rant from someone about Neal being Peter and Elizabeth's kid and the lack of plausibility with that concept.

Yeah, that really doesn't work. LOL! Though Kate looks younger than Neal, I still think she's also too old to be Peter and Elizabeth's kid, or even just Elizabeth's from another relationship.

I think dragonfly below here makes the most sense thinking Kate could be Elizabeth's sister.

Let me know what you think when you see the episode! ;)

Reply


dragonfly December 5 2009, 17:46:05 UTC
I mean, she could be Elizabeth's daughter.

I don't think they are mother and daugher but sisters. IF they are related. Which they should be, because that'd be the only reason casting casted those two similar looking actresses.

And I'm pretty sure there's a (even if far-fetched) explanation for Peter's scene at the end, which still will make him a good guy. Otherwise this show would have jumped that shark way too early. But I'm looking forward reading all the hundreds and hundreds of far-off theories over the next month. LOL

Is it January yet?

Reply

ann_tara December 5 2009, 17:59:38 UTC
I don't think they are mother and daugher but sisters. IF they are related. Which they should be, because that'd be the only reason casting casted those two similar looking actresses.

D'oh! I don't know why I didn't think sisters right off the bat. Of course, that makes the most sense. IF, like you said, there's any relationship at all. Could just be the casting director has a thing for a particular-looking type of woman whenever they're casting. But those two are just eerily similar. I hope there's a point, and not just the actions of a pervy casting choice.

And I'm pretty sure there's a (even if far-fetched) explanation for Peter's scene at the end, which still will make him a good guy. Otherwise this show would have jumped that shark way too early.That's what I'm thinking - hoping - too, especially with the ratings they're getting for this one. Has it already been renewed for a second season? I can't recall, but surely it will, and they can't go forward with a series like this making the central relationship so duplicitous from ( ... )

Reply

dragonfly December 5 2009, 18:42:49 UTC
IF, like you said, there's any relationship at all.

If they're not related... I wonder if casting is THAT smart that they were just messing with our heads to begin with? We'll probably never know... *g*

Reply


simonesa December 13 2009, 05:50:52 UTC
Where the hell did that come from? They have set up a situation that could go very badly if they don't have a good scenario when they come back.

I was honestly, seriously terrified they would make Moz into a bad guy, backstabber. Imagine my surprise to see what looked like Peter in that final scene. Hilarious.

Reply

ann_tara December 15 2009, 12:42:13 UTC
They have set up a situation that could go very badly if they don't have a good scenario when they come back.

It SO better not be what it seems! I'm biting my nails on this one. *eek*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up