The Metropolitan Police has issued guidance to its officers to remind them that using a camera in public is not in itself a terrorist offence.It warms my heart every time I read something like this. As a semi-photographer, I get annoyed at how many cops try to push photographers around by misquoting or flat out misusing anti-Terror and privacy
(
Read more... )
I'm sorry, but you can be a cop, or a solider, not both. Military learned that lesson the hard way after WWII. A lot of the anti-terror classes present the cops to a soldier's world view. And most Anti-Terror classes are taught by the wrong instructors. You spent 10 years in the SEALs fighting Al'Quada, great. However, the skills you used have nothing in common with a random NYPD officer who is walking a beat in the Bronx. Now, more realistic trainers are entering the market, and the quick-buck are moving on.
I think this is a as part of the Met's reevaluation of it's counter terror role and training goals. I also find a little black humour in the fact that the Met had been dealing with the anti-terror roll for years prior to 9/11. 9/11, which took place in another country, happens and they suddenly have to scrap everything and start over, mirroring the US.
Reply
True. During Katrina and the RNC the riot squads didn't answer to the local department and wouldn't identify themselves when making arrests. Probably Iraq-trained mercenaries trained to kill enemies, but the enemies were the people they were patrolling. I hope you're right and they're moving on.
Reply
*shrugs*
Some of them taught me what it took to be human in a time when I wasn't, and so despite the rarity of soldier to cop to soldier working, I note the exceptions.
Reply
Leave a comment