So I finally got a chance to watch the next installment of The Hollow Crown! I hadn't had a chance previously because I was visiting family, and then I kept getting distracted by the fact that Richard II was in the same file folder and I kept thinking "oh, hey, I could watch that again!" Plus it's been really good for taking my mind off of the
(
Read more... )
(I also disapprove of them cutting out the decoy bit. Which is, again weirdly, one of my favourite bits - because it actually happened and I have fond memories of flailing all other my mother when I saw the Globe version of it.)
AND HIDDLESTON'S JEREMY IRONS IMPRESSION! That was pretty much my favourite thing ever, to be honest.
I also loved Henry's excellent timing. "Vicious rebel army, possibly going to get slaughtered, still plagued by guilt - GONNA COUGH UP BLOOD NOW, OVER TO MY SON!" XDD
(And, er, on a faintly random note: I was also very fond of Doll! I think I may implode when it gets to the bit where she has actual lines. This may be embarrassing and painful.)
Reply
Also, I always get so outraged when they don't do the decoys! BECAUSE. SO VERY SYMBOLIC. (Another production I saw went to the trouble of actually casting someone as Blunt who resembled Henry and then they still didn't do it. Bah.)
Reply
And I'm not sure how I'll react to the Falstaff scene yet, though by the reviews coming in I'll probably be eating my words while crying loudly, but I'm pretty sure that the last Henry IV scene will have me on the point of hysteria. I love Jeremy Irons, I want more of Jeremy Irons all the time.
THE DECOYS ARE AMAZING AND EVERYBODY SHOULD DO THEM! Because, yeah, it jsut says SO MUCH about Henry's character - you wouldn't really see Richard doing that, or Hal. And so it's very important and character defining and JUST KEEP IT IN, IT IS A GREAT SCENE! ;;
Reply
Also, I think it's so telling that the other person in Shakespeare's histories who does the decoy thing is Richmond in Richard III! I've never felt that RIII is just straight-up Tudor propaganda at all, and that is one of the suggestive bits in that regard. (I mean, I also am apparently a distinct minority among medieval English history fans, because I also don't think Henry VII was History's Greatest Monster, but that's a complicated topic. Maybe if this does well enough that they decide to do the other tetralogy. /pipe dream)
Reply
Leave a comment