NurtureShock: New Thinking About Children,part 1: praise,sleep,race,liars

Feb 05, 2011 14:42

This book give you (the reader) supposedly shocking insights into the nature of children. Indeed, so far it's interesting, though "shocking" wouldn't be my term. It's based on research, but I don't have the same solid confidence in that research that I do in the research for "What's Going on In There". I suspect it's been dumbed down for a wider ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

sidheag February 7 2011, 09:09:16 UTC
I had a very shocking conversation with my very dear friend gemmaj (whose parents are Chinese, and who suffered serious racism growing up) along the lines of "colourblind is nonsense you MUST discuss race" some years back. I still think that some of what she said to me was based on a misconception about C's environment, and that article makes it rather clearer. It might be true that Helen gets enough information about race that she has formed her own stereotypical conclusions. I really, even when I look around thinking about it, think that C did not (and does not, but now he's at an age where I'm comfortable discussing it). Looking at our friends and his schoolmates, although they're obviously not statistically representative of the UK population, he meets people of many ethnicities and he does not get any message that ethnicity is salient. And looking around Edinburgh, we also don't have the kind of segregation by occupation or part of town that seems to be common in the US. No TV input. I don't see how he'd have formed racial stereotypes and I've never been able to discover any sign that he has. When I want to discuss "we're all the same under the skin" far more fruitful cases to discuss are gender and class (not by name - that's the area that's unspeakable here, and noone would think it appropriate to name it to young children! - but by "those people on the bus who say 'fuck' twice in every sentence are probably perfectly nice people, it's just that they come from a group where it's normal to talk like that"). To talk about race, I first have to tell him what stereotypes exist. And now I do, but I don't agree that it would have been useful to do that before I was quite sure that he was capable of a sophisticated understanding of "stereotype".

Reply

anemone February 13 2011, 01:10:40 UTC
What I found was very interesting is that children apparently don't need external input about racial bias to come to racist conclusions. Take the experiment in which they put half the class in red shirts and half in blue shirts, and students came to think kids with their shirt color were better. I suspect this wouldn't happen if one of the groups was very small, though.

I'm not sure what exposure Helen has to stereotypes, but we do have skin color divisions in occupations here (and presumably in neighborhoods, since occupation determines income which determines where you can afford to live)--cafeteria workers & janitors at IBM are largely Spanish-speaking, administrative assistants at IBM disproportionately black compared to the researchers, and the daycare workers are disproportionately black compared to the students they care for, etc.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up