>В популяциях YR наблюдается монотонный рост их генетического сродства с современными южными китайцами и юго-восточными азиатами так это значит миграции с юга, там еще раньше земледелие возникло?
"These results suggest a long-term genetic connection between YR populations across time but with an important axis of exogenous genetic contribution that may be related to the northward expansion of rice farming by population migrations from south China (e.g. Yangtze river)."
Они еще сетуют на то, что у них нет геномов культур-кандидатов на неолитическое первенство.
Указывается, что эти генетические изменения были связаны с увеличением роли рисоводства на Центральных равнинах. Выходит, что пришли рисоводы с Янцзы, но в конечном итоге вернулись к просу?
"The Middle-to-Late Neolithic genetic change in the YR also coincides with the intensification of rice farming in the Central Plain, which may provide another case of change in subsistence strategy via demic diffusion. We acknowledge that our current data set lacks ancient genomes from candidate source populations which may have brought rice farming into the Central Plain and call for archaeogenetic studies for them, especially Neolithic people from the Shandong and Lower Yangtze River regions. "
Baligang is a Neolithic site with a long occupation, from before 6300 BC up to the first millennium BC, although the bulk of excavated finds and archaeobotanical evidence from the site comes from the Yangshao, Qujialing, Shijiahe and Longshan (4300-1800 BC) ... The earliest occupation of the site represents a pre-Yangshao society with early cultivation of rice (Oryza). In later periods Baligang has evidence for mixed farming of both rice and millets ... In the Late Longshan period, when millet became more prominent and the cultural influence shifted northwards, it appears that more sedge-infested and weedy rice fields became the norm, suggesting a decline in rice cultivation intensity
Comments 8
так это значит миграции с юга, там еще раньше земледелие возникло?
Reply
"These results suggest a long-term genetic connection between YR populations across time but with an important axis of exogenous genetic contribution that may be related to the northward expansion of rice farming by population migrations from south China (e.g. Yangtze river)."
Они еще сетуют на то, что у них нет геномов культур-кандидатов на неолитическое первенство.
Reply
Reply
Reply
потом пшеница
рис выращивали на янцзы
Reply
"The Middle-to-Late Neolithic genetic change in the YR also coincides with the intensification of rice farming in the Central Plain, which may provide another case of change in subsistence strategy via demic diffusion. We acknowledge that our current data set lacks ancient genomes from candidate source populations which may have brought rice farming into the Central Plain and call for archaeogenetic studies for them, especially Neolithic people from the Shandong and Lower Yangtze River regions. "
Reply
Baligang is a Neolithic site with a long occupation, from before 6300 BC up to the first millennium BC, although the bulk of excavated finds and archaeobotanical evidence from the site comes from the Yangshao, Qujialing, Shijiahe and Longshan (4300-1800 BC)
...
The earliest occupation of the site represents a pre-Yangshao society with early cultivation of rice (Oryza). In later periods Baligang has evidence for mixed farming of both rice and millets
...
In the Late Longshan period, when millet became more prominent and the cultural influence shifted northwards, it appears that more sedge-infested and weedy rice fields became the norm, suggesting a decline in rice cultivation intensity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226715300040
Reply
Leave a comment