I just can't get my head around calling it "Neil Gaiman's Miracle Man". No shade intended to Mr G, but it's Mike Anglo's Marvelman (as re-imagined by Alan Moore, of course).
Look, even calling it "Miracleman" seems wrong to me, which proves nothing except that I am become old.
Agreed, it makes perfect sense to refer to Gaiman's run on Miracleman, it just seemed that the possessive was being attached to the character, not the storyline. It would seem strange to talk about Gaiman's Superman, or Mark Waid's Captain America, I think.
And also agreed, no-one cares about Mick Anglo except sad old Fans like me.
Comments 3
Reply
(And, frankly, less than 1% of people who care about Miracleman want to read Mike Anglo's version of it)
Reply
Agreed, it makes perfect sense to refer to Gaiman's run on Miracleman, it just seemed that the possessive was being attached to the character, not the storyline. It would seem strange to talk about Gaiman's Superman, or Mark Waid's Captain America, I think.
And also agreed, no-one cares about Mick Anglo except sad old Fans like me.
Reply
Leave a comment