Mar 27, 2017 12:00
windpower,
history,
ohforfuckssake,
protests,
security,
hydroelectric,
society,
africa,
fail,
class,
economics,
corruption,
energy,
internet,
employment,
viadanieldwilliam,
gender,
russia,
egypt,
electricity,
politics,
nazis,
links,
ocean
Leave a comment
Reply
Unfortunately, desalinating sea water is generally done at about 5 to 6 times the pressure you'd get at the bottom of a column of sea water 133 metres high.
Reply
It strikes me as an awful lot of salt to be selling. (A bit of Google and excel suggest that extracting the salt from the water would give you between 20 and 30 million tonnes of salt over a ten year period which compares with a global market for salt of 300 million tonnes a year. So actually not that much in the grand scheme of things.)
You'd also get about 500 tonnes of gold I think. And other stuff.
I wonder if there is anywhere in the world with a large enough drop that one could run reverse osmoisis just from the head pressure.
Reply
It would likely be cheaper and faster to build an electrified rail link than a canal. When power is cheap, haul tanker cars of water to the top of the mountain. When you need power, let them roll down into the depression and extract energy via regenerative braking. Empty the tanker cars at the bottom, and send them back up empty. Unit trains can easily haul 10,000 cubic metres of water at a time, with automated filling and dumping.
Reply
Pumped storage round tripping efficiency is about 70-80%. Regnerative braking (in a Tesla) seems to be about 64%. Not a long chalk away. Can't see anything on the round trip efficiency of rail based regenerative braking.
http://www.aresnorthamerica.com/
I guess there's no reason not to do all of it if the Sahara ends up covered in solar panels.
Reply
Leave a comment