Oct 20, 2016 12:00
mindfulness,
autism,
behaviour,
astronomy,
law,
brain,
inflammation,
life,
economics,
satire,
reform,
awesome,
meditation,
links,
hoax,
cars,
uk,
sun,
automation,
voting,
facebook,
labour,
green,
fail,
dogs,
money,
snp,
depression,
space,
lgbt,
housing,
polls,
politics,
adult,
libdem
Leave a comment
Judging a currency as an indicator of national economic success, or - even worse - it's value as an entity - is a great mistake. A falling currency is a sign of value reducing, just as a rising currency is a sign of value increasing; nothing more, nothing less. If the value is reducing then you do indeed want your currency to fall or you will have an overvalued currency (which is indeed bad) - which is why, since the 1970s, most countries have allowed their exchange rates to float over time, to reflect the balance of supply and demand.
If the author was right and the main driver of reducing value was an outflow of "speculative funds invested in the property sector", causing the "finance-property bubble to deflate", I think many people would be rejoicing. The actual data, though, suggest that "House prices continued to rise strongly following the Brexit vote - driven by increases in eastern and southern England" (source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37689595).
So overall I'm pretty unconvinced by that article.
Reply
It does. That's what it means by:
FTSE 100 index, comprising large multinationals...
The FTSE 250 - based on mid-caps deriving half their revenues from the British domestic market...
Even the FTSE “Local” index, whose companies derive 70 per cent or more of their revenues by selling their goods and services within Britain...
Which is clearly pointing out that there are three different indices, each of which has different levels of exposure to the pound.
I agree with you about the housing though.
Reply
Reply
"The pound is down, but stocks priced in pounds have gone up! Woo!" is not as reassuring as it might seem.
Reply
Reply
About level in dollar terms.
Reply
Leave a comment