Leave a comment

drdoug July 29 2016, 06:32:26 UTC
It may be the latter. The No2NP site is certainly full of tales from the pilots that are pretty much "see, it's as terrible as we said it would be", e.g.:
http://no2np.org/dad-speaks-aspergers-sons-named-person-ordeal/
http://no2np.org/slick-article-fails-convince-parents/
and there's a trickle of this sort of story:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/revealed-what-can-happen-when-a-named-person-reports-on-your-children-1-4089077

I think it's true that the Scottish Government is convinced that "yes, it works" but I don't think it's fair to say that's a consensus. I genuinely don't know what the evaluation process for the pilots has been, but it would be an extraordinarily thorough and independent evaluation that was able to explore whether these sorts of concerns outweighed the benefits when the whole premise of the scheme is that they are indeed outweighed. And the fact that there is no clear guidance about data protection practice (again, SFAICT, I could be wrong) suggests that this was not an issue the evaluation explored particularly deeply.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up