Jan 29, 2016 01:00
ohforfuckssake,
education,
rape,
europe,
starwars,
conspiracy,
scotland,
inters,
reporting,
video,
colour,
intelligence,
class,
privilege,
mentalhealth,
genes,
race,
money,
schizophrenia,
housing,
tax,
viaswampers,
politics,
libdem,
links,
welfare,
cats
Leave a comment
Reply
Reply
Reply
Look at the examples in the article:
"I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented."
"When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is."
"If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race."
"I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time."
Not one of these is about having leverage, or a multiplier of something else. You can't multiply any of these by zero, because they are not numbers on a scale.
They are simply things that some people have, and others don't, which affect people on a day to day basis.
And having something which someone doesn't, is a "privilege". It's what "privilege" means, in this context.
Reply
Reply
I'm not convinced this is the case for privilge below a certain level of socio-economic deprevation
Then I think you need to look at the people who are speaking from those levels, who _are_ clearly deeply emotionally and socially effected by lack of representation.
If you think that having the cops pull you over for being black doesn't have an effect, just because you're poor, then I am, frankly, boggled.
Reply
Reply
In that case those people _don't_ have that privilege over black people, on that specific thing. And anyone claiming they do is wrong.
But that's got nothing to do with zero bounds. Because privilege is not a ladder. A black man and a white woman are both privileged over each other, in different contexts.
Reply
Leave a comment