Dec 02, 2015 12:00
work,
flash,
web,
programming,
death,
air,
scotland,
society,
usa,
globalwarming,
disease,
satire,
nhs,
archeology,
fat,
architecture,
ocean,
welfare,
links,
drugs,
dinosaurs,
diabetes,
agile,
immune_system,
syria,
police,
starwars,
viatheweaselking,
guaranteedincome,
design,
hiv,
jobs,
race,
money,
gender,
racism,
war,
libdem
Leave a comment
Reply
Reply
Well, for a generation maybe.
I suspect an average rise of just 2-3 degrees is probably enough to crash the global food chain though.
Reply
No, our only hope is the Singularity. Self-replicating AI, which doesn't need oxygen, may be our only heirs. Unfortunately I don't believe in the Singularity either. For there to be self-replicating AI, humans first have to build machines capable of getting to that point. I see no evidence that we can, and neither do the experts I believe.
Reply
And no, I agree, I see no evidence for computers achieving that either.
Reply
Reply
I sometimes kinda wonder if it's inevitable that civilisations all snuff themselves out in the late-industrial phase, because on all alien worlds throughout the universe, it probably follows the same pattern. Burn fossil fuels for cheap energy - destroy environment. (And that this explains why we can't detect any life in the Universe. Because they all do what we're doing.)
But I think ~radical~ intervention in the 90s might have saved us. So I don't think it was too late then. So that we entered the 00's having done nothing but accelerate the rate at which we were burning fossil fuels, that was the tipping point for me.
When the end comes as well, I think it will come faster than anybody is predicting. Because the data on these methane melts in the permafrost are absolutely terrifying.
Reply
Reply
Oddly the best thing that could happen for the planet is for a super storm cell to hit Florida and wipe the state from the face of the map. Unless something like that happens, I don't think we'll even at least try to save ourselves.
Reply
Reply
And indeed let us not forget that China have been frantically buying up a lot of real estate in prime arable land in Africa, in parts that are predicted to last quite well in the face of global warming.
But yes, I agree, I think we will see catastrophic wars, escalating to nuclear exchanges before the end.
Which I suppose ironically might save some of us. Nuclear winter to offset global warming?
Reply
I was quite amused when the government's energy security strategy turned out to openly be "we'll be able to import it from friends". I assume the food security will be the same, and then it'll turn out this relies on having money and friends ;-)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment