Oct 27, 2015 12:00
viapatrickhadfield,
work,
google,
borderlands,
cultural_appropriation,
meat,
feminism,
time,
games,
research,
sexuality,
democracy,
welfare,
links,
drugs,
ohforfuckssake,
asexual,
science,
viaerindubitably,
uk,
search,
media,
dna,
europe,
nuclearpower,
ai,
facebook,
epicfail,
reporting,
turkey,
people,
representation,
cancer,
gaming,
lgbt,
tax,
food,
harrassment,
greece
Leave a comment
The study apparently claims (though I can't find this so clearly stated in the actual data) that 3.3% of premature deaths in the study could have been avoided had that person eaten less processed meats. That is an astoundingly high amount. Yes it isn't as high as smoking but it is getting within an order of magnitude. It seems likely it is going to put it into the top ten causes for early death. Put it another way. Roll 2 d6. On a double six you died early because of the amount of red meat you ate (I'm rounding). Comfortable with those odds? I'm not -- note that I didn't even condition on the fact you were eating any. So if that number is true, I'm certainly going to cut down my consumption of processed meat.
One reason, perhaps, that the article you linked comes out so differently is what is compared. The comparison is with 50g of processed meat and 100g of red meat a day (it's unclear whether this is 150 g of meat or 100g of meat 50g of which is processed -- my reading of the original article would be that it is 100g of meat total). The UK guidelines are 70g per day. So the comparison point is with someone slightly exceeding government guidelines. For smoking they have picked to compare with someone smoking two packs per day. That is a quite astounding amount to smoke. UK government statistics classify 20 or more per day as "heavy smoker" and that's only around 1/5 of smokers. I found a report with some stats from 1985 saying 14% of smokers were 40 or more cigarettes per day. I'm betting that has dropped a lot since.
In other words the comparison done is between someone eating slightly more than the government says is a healthy limit for meat and someone smoking a really quite crazy amount of cigarettes.
And yes, cigarettes are more harmful -- the excess deaths from smoking is about 80 times as much worldwide as the excess deaths from meat eating. But, you know what, cigarettes are really incredibly bad for you. Finding something that is within a couple of orders of magnitude as bad for you... that's still pretty bad for you.
Reply
And I should probably cut down my processed-meat consumption. But I love salami so much!
Mmmmm, pepperami.
Reply
I can live without salami or bacon -- I am very keen on chorizo though.
Reply
Reply
Unfortunately, I'm not now going to find time to work through this properly before going on holiday tomorrow.
Reply
(Have a great holiday!)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment