Leave a comment

nancylebov April 18 2015, 12:45:48 UTC
Supposing that young men need war to feel like they've become adult men, and the rest of us don't want to live on battlefields, then what?

Reply

andrewducker April 18 2015, 14:43:37 UTC
Then understanding that, and giving them other outlets, would be key to finding a solution?

Reply

nancylebov April 18 2015, 16:35:07 UTC
I agree, but what other outlets would be satisfactory?

Reply

nancylebov April 19 2015, 09:53:05 UTC
I was half-listening to a radio piece about people and their boats, and someone said it was a worldwide fraternity because people had to trust each other for help in live and death situations. Perhaps a boating challenge would do the job.

This being said, in contemporary society I don't think there's a legal way for people to risk their lives without putting a chunk of money into it, and that might be its own problem.

Reply

strawberryfrog April 19 2015, 22:40:46 UTC
Football?

Reply

newandrewhickey April 18 2015, 16:48:08 UTC
Tell the young men "tough". I'm a man, and I became an adult man without ever once needing to kill anyone. The idea in that piece, that "men are wired for war", is clearly nonsense -- the supermajority of men, now or ever, have not fought in wars, have not wanted to fight in wars, and haven't been any less men as a result.
Which is not to say that aggression isn't biologically driven, and that those drives don't need an outlet, but *war* is a social construct, and its appeal is very limited even among men.

Reply

nancylebov April 19 2015, 09:53:46 UTC
Good point.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up