Leave a comment

Comments 28

momentsmusicaux December 11 2014, 11:13:40 UTC
'High-entropy alloys are materials that consist of five or more metals in approximately equal amounts'

Google is failing to tell me why the term 'high-entropy' applies.

Anyone here know?

Reply

andrewducker December 11 2014, 13:08:54 UTC
Good question. I can't find a good explanation either!

"High-entropy alloys (HEAs), or multi-principal-element alloys, emerge as a new research frontier in the metallic materials community. HEAs differentiate with conventional alloys in that they have at least four principal elements, instead of one or two in the latter."

The definition is fine - but why "high entropy"?

Reply

channelpenguin December 11 2014, 13:30:02 UTC
Hmmm. It would be nice to know, given that the literal translation seems to me to be open to several meanings (of both stability and decay). Maybe they just mean to indicate - "Very Stable" - i.e. not subject to any further decay/degradation?

Reply

a_pawson December 11 2014, 15:19:42 UTC
I suspect it has become a buzzword, devolved from the actual meaning of the word.

I would guess that the logic goes a bit like: Entropy is a measure of the disorder of a system. Alloys with only 1 element in them are nice and ordered. Add a second element and it's a but more disordered. We've got an alloy with 5 elements in it, that's like really disordered, it has more entropy. Let's call them high-entropy metals, the marketing people will love that.

Reply


cmcmck December 11 2014, 13:30:57 UTC
So people fighting for basic human rights are killjoys are they?

Sigh :o(

Reply

andrewducker December 11 2014, 13:33:13 UTC
Man-hating zealots dedicated to the destruction of right-thinking society, every one of them!

Reply

cmcmck December 11 2014, 13:52:52 UTC
:op

Reply

andrewducker December 11 2014, 14:09:32 UTC
The site with that list on it is a feminist site. I assume that the headline is entirely ironic.

Reply


danieldwilliam December 11 2014, 14:43:31 UTC
I'm interested in the DC thing. It's an odd constitutional anomaly and two of my pals are very involved in DC local politics.

Meddling with DC seems like a short sighted move on the part of the Republicans as it only increases the visibility of the injustice of the current situation. As the most likely rectification of the situation is for DC to become a State and have 1 Representative and 2 Senators, all Democrats, it's not to the Republicans interest to encourage that.

Reply

andrewducker December 11 2014, 21:16:47 UTC
DC has always struck me as being in a very odd situation. I wonder how tenable it really is over the long term - and whether they have any chance of changing it.

Reply

danieldwilliam December 12 2014, 10:14:09 UTC
I think the chances of getting it changed are probably slim.

On each individual issue the Democrats will usually find it easier to disappoint DC than to lose something else.

When it comes to the crunch of making DC a state the Republicans will always find it very, very useful to prevent that.

And it's not like there is anyone else to vote for, or any way for that vote to count.

Reply


soon_lee December 11 2014, 17:59:21 UTC
The Tolkien story is so meta.

Reply

nancylebov December 11 2014, 20:09:06 UTC
I would like to live in that universe.

Reply


nancylebov December 11 2014, 20:11:50 UTC
The torture link is just dispiriting for me. (That's after activating the rationality module-- the initial thought was "total fucking despair".)

Pro-torture and anti-torture people have really different moral intuitions. Of course the right thing to do is insist that your moral intuitions are correct instead of working on learning how to convince people who don't share your intuitions.

Reply

andrewducker December 11 2014, 20:29:05 UTC
At this point I am no more prepared to argue with people whose moral intuitions is that torture is a good information extraction method than I am prepared to argue with people who think that slavery is economically useful or that genocide is a solution for overpopulation.

Engaging with ideas sends a signal that they are ideas worth engaging with. I will not provide that kind of signal for torture.

Reply

nancylebov December 11 2014, 22:58:03 UTC
Do you have any ideas about how to increase the proportion of people who are revolted by torture?

Reply

newandrewhickey December 12 2014, 00:42:41 UTC
I actually think that expressions of disgust and anger like mine might be the best way of doing that, though that wasn't my main aim ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up