Nov 03, 2014 11:00
virus,
fantasy,
work,
fraud,
immigration,
malaria,
brain,
journalism,
quantum,
life,
passion,
time,
aliens,
advice,
iq,
disease,
environment,
games,
sex,
transport,
research,
architecture,
billgates,
ethics,
links,
trams,
uk,
europe,
funny,
video,
physics,
intelligence,
japan,
fashion,
space,
psychology,
bigbangtheory,
housing,
food,
religion,
violence,
manchester,
politics
Leave a comment
TL;DR appears to be "no, it isn't"... which is sort of the opposite of what you'd expect from the title. Interesting article.
Reply
Reply
But at the risk of seeming like I have sense of humour failure, I was expecting a Betteridgeable article but, in fact, the writer was rather convincingly arguing that the answer definitely was no from the start of the article. It gave me that "huh?" feeling -- because I believe there probably is some g, and it turns out so does the author of that page, just as I was ready to look for holes in the argument I found I was furiously agreeing. Disconcerting.
Reply
Reply
From the article "The g factor accounts for 59 percent of the common factor variance" -- that's the kind of result that in most human measurement fields have you leaping around yelling "eureka".
Reply
But if it's true, then it means that some people are smarter than others. Which means that we're not all equal! Which is clearly wrong. Apparently.
Reply
Leave a comment