Oct 13, 2014 12:00
computers,
language,
scotland,
brain,
movies,
lions,
northernireland,
marriage,
sex,
links,
drugs,
epicwtf,
men,
argument,
interview,
math,
uk,
funny,
starwars,
toxoplasmagondii,
u2,
green,
calendars,
photography,
cancer,
parasites,
ukip,
psychology,
lgbt,
religion,
models,
politics,
scifi,
debate,
cats
Leave a comment
I don't like it, but it's a reasonable argument.
Reply
Whereas dragging Farage into the debate might just reveal him for what he is.
And nobody wants the leadership debates to have representatives from every party, otherwise it would take 8 hours and nobody would watch it.
Not good reasons. But understandable ones.
Reply
I'm not expecting to see Syed Kammall in any of the debates.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I can't remember if Salmond appeared in any debates ahead of GE2010.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Which is arguably a good thing.
Reply
I liked the sound of Carswell UKIP much more than Farage UKIP.
Reply
I mean don't get me wrong, I would want to rescue neither from a burning house. But if I had to choose, I'd want Carswell brand UKIP too.
Reply
Reply
'We can haz Carswell?'
I think also, Carswell, whatever else he is, is still a parliamentarian, and understands the concept of democratic decisions and power sharing. Whereas Farage has run UKIP simply as a one-man-show dictatorship.
So there is at least a vague chance now UKIP will self-implode.
Reply
Farage is the Face of UKIP.
Carswell (and probably Reckless) are the actual Votes.
If you want to know UKIP policy is it what Farage says it is or what Carswell actually votes for?
My favourite possible outcome for GE15 would be for UKIP to win about 20 seats but for Farage not to win his.
My how I would laugh.
Reply
Leave a comment