Sep 12, 2014 12:00
newspapers,
cars,
technology,
fraud,
independence,
uk,
google,
bbc,
parents,
voting,
genetics,
starwars,
funny,
referendum,
apartheid,
scotland,
society,
usb,
intelligence,
banking,
inequality,
race,
polls,
c#,
happiness,
politics,
southafrica,
children,
links
Leave a comment
But either way round, there's a massive confounder in there. My very strong guess is that some people really want kids, and some people really don't. (With some in the middle.) Over time, most of the people who really want kids have kids, and most of the people who don't, don't. Comparing self-reported happiness from parents and non-parents doesn't tell you about whether those people would be happier if they switched their parent status. Certainly from my anecdotal experience, people who really want kids but don't have them tend to be pretty bloody miserable about it, and so are people who really don't want kids but do have them.
(As an aside, I'm always suspicious of (some) 'happy' research. I don't want to be happy! Well, all equal I'd much rather be happy than sad, of course, but more important to me is doing the right thing. For me, and I suspect others, there's a big difference between happiness and life satisfaction. Although even then, I would rather do more good and feel less satisfied, up to a limit.)
So I don't think this sort of research is likely to generate actionable insight for people wondering whether to have children, which it is often presented as.
Reply
Reply
Reply
For example, "We're doing a survey of parents against non-parents, and we just wanted to ask you one question - " rather clearly leads in - as does asking the happiness question after all the other questions about kids.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The huge giveaway is that the parents are significantly more likely to smoke. Is that because the childfree have such stress-free lives that they find it easier to quit? No, it's because they were more middle class to begin with.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment