Leave a comment

Comments 24

bart_calendar August 26 2014, 11:04:09 UTC
So now Gawker, Jezebel, Buzzfied, Clickhole and Vice will simply have to pay money to Facebook to get people to see their clickbait links.

Reply

andrewducker August 26 2014, 12:26:58 UTC
By making them into adverts?

If they find that they can do that profitably, they should go for it. Good luck to them :->

I'd be happy if they just had a headline that told you WTF you were going to see!

Reply

bart_calendar August 26 2014, 12:29:34 UTC
They won't make them adverts. They'll just exclude them from the ban when people post them on their timelines. All for a decent fee, I'm sure.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

andrewducker August 26 2014, 12:27:40 UTC
Fingers crossed.

Glad you liked the Love article. I didn't really see the point of the person who was jumping up and down on Twitter. And was at lunch, so missed the discussion as it happened.

Reply

alitheapipkin August 26 2014, 12:36:12 UTC
Someone was jumping up and down about it? Please tell me because they were miffed about it slagging off John Lennon and not because they disagreed with the point!

Reply

andrewducker August 26 2014, 12:38:28 UTC
Sadly not.

They are actually largely agreeing with the article, but objecting to the word "Love" being used to describe what 99% of people mean by the word "Love".

Reply


pashazade August 26 2014, 11:27:17 UTC
I like the Love Is Not Enough post enormously.

One of the best pieces of advice I ever heard was in the vicar's sermon at my friend's wedding. He said "When we think of the promise to love someone for as long as you both shall live, we think of it wrongly. We think of love as being only an emotion - how can you promise to always feel an emotion? It's not under your control, and you *won't* always feel it, no matter how much you would like to. In the original Greek, love is not only an emotion but an action. Love is something you *do*, and *that* is what you promise."

Reply

alitheapipkin August 26 2014, 11:42:26 UTC
That is a well made point.

The Boy and I wrote our own vows and all our promises were about how we would behave- no-one can expect to keep promises about how they will feel, emotions are fickle things.

Reply

andrewducker August 26 2014, 12:28:26 UTC
Absolutely. I've promised to do things for Julie, and we've had discussions about how to deal with long-term emotional changes.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


resonant August 26 2014, 12:00:44 UTC
I like the idea of wireless actuators that use pizeoelectric energy rather than batteries!

Reply

andrewducker August 26 2014, 12:28:53 UTC
Me too! I think it's an awesome idea - I hope it catches on.

Reply


4 year olds and school readiness woodpijn August 26 2014, 13:03:18 UTC
We have an intelligent, introverted 4yo who is looking forward to starting school next month, but anxious that she'll be expected to play with other children all the time. She was greatly reassured when I said it won't be all playing, there'll probably be some sitting down doing worksheets as well.

Reply

Re: 4 year olds and school readiness andrewducker August 26 2014, 15:20:18 UTC
School - something for everyone!

But yes, hopefully they'll cope ok with an introvert.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up