Leave a comment

gonzo21 December 11 2013, 12:59:09 UTC
Well, a £4000-£8000 rise in domestic electricity costs is unsustainable... If that's true that will get people over their objection to nuclear power pretty damned fast.

Reply

skreidle December 15 2013, 03:17:29 UTC
The only viable argument I've heard against nuclear energy is actually on a total-lifecycle-cost basis -- that's to say that when all costs (mining, transportation, construction, execution, management, disposal/storage, etc.) are taken into account, the cost-per-megawatt is actually no better than comparable to any other source, if not higher.

Reply

gonzo21 December 15 2013, 16:53:30 UTC
I suppose that doesn't desperately surprise me, if it was madly cheaper then... market forces being what they are, we wouldn't be burning half as many hydrocarbons.

Reply

andrewducker December 15 2013, 17:01:42 UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source#UK_2010_estimates is pretty good (and there are estimates from other sources there too)

Reply

gonzo21 December 15 2013, 17:20:24 UTC
Ah, interesting. And there's the reason the world is burning lots of natural gas eh.

Reply

skreidle December 15 2013, 22:59:05 UTC
The real reason to fight nuclear power has nothing to do with health risks | Quartz -- [Missing from the entire debate about nuclear is the most important fact of all: Nuclear is dying due to poor economics, and the debate is already over as far as the market is concerned.]

(From Andy in mid/late August, incidentally.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up