Oct 29, 2013 11:00
music,
rape,
trains,
programming,
scotland,
society,
phones,
thinking,
makeup,
economics,
usa,
advice,
sex,
books,
transport,
broadband,
architecture,
children,
3dprinting,
animals,
links,
healthcare,
weather,
history,
inflation,
cute,
insurance,
uk,
nature,
vietnam,
funny,
construction,
comics,
labour,
design,
neilgaiman,
development,
internet,
tv,
gender,
morality,
war,
motorola,
politics
Reply
Reply
It's essentially a moral trade-off because different segments of the population are affected by unemployment, low growth and inflation.
Reply
I'm thinking of the long-term here, largely. And that the long-term effects of high inflation would be bad for people at all levels. A few months of 25% inflation would be annoying, but shouldn't throw the country into disarray. If it stayed that way for long periods then investment would, I'd have thought, start to have problems.
I don't actually know enough about when it starts to go wrong though!
Reply
If you have no inflation, you massively reduce the incentive to invest - because you can just bury your wealth in a hole in the ground and you aren't going to lose any of it (even if you might gain more if you invested correctly, just storing it has practically zero risk in the absence of inflation, which is very attractive to humans).
Reply
When I hear phrase "the economy" in a sentence, I usually substitute "people who own tons of stuff", and it's amazing how often the sentence makes sense when it didn't before. Inflation is bad for the economy!
Reply
Leave a comment