Leave a comment

Re: MBTI andrewducker September 19 2013, 12:25:54 UTC
I agree that it's a good conversation starter, and gives people language for discussing differences.

The Big Five has more of a scientific background, and is worth taking a look at. The MB types map somewhat onto them too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator#Big_Five

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, scattered, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Extroversion: 58%
Orderliness: 38%
Emotional Stability: 36%
Accommodation: 60%
Inquisitiveness: 74%

http://similarminds.com/cgi-bin/newbig5.pl

Reply

Re: MBTI gwendally September 19 2013, 12:30:55 UTC
Is this related in any way to the DISC method? Because I'm being trained on that starting next month as part of a training program on how to be a decent supervisor.

I'm fine with abandoning MBTI if I don't have to abandon somewhat hard-won knowledge; my Human Resources toolkit is really small and I hate to lose what little help I've had.

Reply

Re: MBTI andrewducker September 19 2013, 12:40:03 UTC
Big Five is a grouping that's been consistently replicated by psyhcology researchers. It has actual scientific backing.

Whereas DiSC is run by a company, and I'm not aware of any independent verification that it's actually valid/useful. Some good stuff here:
http://www.ere.net/2008/12/10/dissecting-the-disc/
and
http://hr.toolbox.com/blogs/ira-wolfe/why-disc-doesnt-work-for-employee-screening-49119

And don't throw away your hard-won experience! If you've found something that seems to work for you then just keep refining it and making it work better.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up