Apr 26, 2013 12:00
art,
advertising,
women,
phones,
drm,
faith,
fiction,
hormones,
materials,
nuclearweapons,
books,
sex,
sugar,
viajackie,
breasts,
publishing,
copyright,
links,
epicwtf,
diabetes,
history,
sound,
uk,
livejournal,
mental_health,
diet,
epicfail,
harrypotter,
roleplaying,
recording,
development,
cancer,
gender,
bt,
writing,
estimating,
religion,
suicide,
wikipedia,
paedophilia
Leave a comment
Reply
Reply
Reply
I was just pointing out that people use them.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've always just got on and edited things on WP. That fixes it. I didn't really learn a culture nor did I feel I needed to. My changes are rarely reverted but perhaps because I don't make contraversial ones. If someone reverts, I readd and fix.
But in this case actual editing wouldn't work as the guy was using a bot. Politely asking him... that would probably have worked.
Reply
Which is why I would totally understand if someone's response to "Someone on Wikipedia is doing something I don't like." is to call attention to it publicly rather than try and deal with that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Wikipedia supposedly has this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary
but I think it is obeyed less and less.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment