Jul 20, 2012 12:00
viafanf,
rail,
behaviour,
business,
fraud,
google,
hydroelectric,
death,
scotland,
coal,
phones,
climatechange,
euthenasia,
life,
plugs,
gas,
consultation,
pollution,
usa,
prayer,
sports,
globalwarming,
games,
sex,
weight,
unintendedconsequences,
publishing,
sexuality,
links,
drugs,
obesity,
science,
viaphilmophlegm,
uk,
funny,
disability,
novel,
crime,
wtf,
epicfail,
ebooks,
toys,
marijuana,
erotica,
lies,
vialuckylove,
tetris,
prideandprejudice,
electricity,
iphone,
health,
writing,
power,
food,
religion,
yahoo
Reply
If they can clarify it to make it clear that they don't mean people who have had a few drinks, then I'd be a lot happier.
Reply
Reply
Reply
If pubs are happy to serve drunk people, but trains aren't happy to carry them, doesn't this just mean that if the rule is enforced on trains, there will be a bunch of drunk people with no way home stuck outside a closed station until morning?
Or do they assume that everyone out drinking will either moderate themselves accordingly, or else happen to have the money for a sudden taxi journey at midnight between Edinburgh and Glasgow or hotel room?
Reply
Reply
I'd like to know what the definition of "drunk" is, in this case.
Reply
I wasn't actually that drunk, I'd only had two drinks. But I was horribly distracted by the slot machine to my left, because bright flashing lights distract me easily, and I was trying to work out what the pattern of changing lights was.
I did use it as an excuse to abandon the works night out I was on though!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment