Feb 14, 2012 11:00
broadcasting,
christianity,
piracy,
bittorrent,
women,
law,
feminism,
thepiratebay,
palestine,
usa,
nhs,
materials,
metal,
sex,
military,
israel,
copyright,
architecture,
links,
healthcare,
geeks,
uk,
funny,
police,
productivity,
crime,
epicfail,
intelligence,
franklloydwright,
censorship,
dogs,
bramcohen,
money,
internet,
tv,
social,
poverty,
efficiency,
religion,
guardian,
questions
Leave a comment
The first paragraph of the report on the MOD has some of the most pointless adding up I’ve ever seen. 26 years of combined delay.
A combined overrun of £6bn, that means something. That means that there is £6bn less cash available to someone somewhere. From the point of view of a tax payer it’s not first order important if £5.5bn of that £6bn came from one project or was equally spread. The Big Take Away is that we’re £6bn down.
A total of 26 years delay doesn’t mean anything. If spread across all 15 projects it averages out at 1 ¾ years. Which might be a lot on a three year project to build a new jeep but not so long on a twenty year project to re-design a nuclear submarine. If the time splipage were concentrated on one project that might mean a very different situation. A 20 year delay on replacing our nuclear submarines might mean that we don’t have a nuclear deterent for a decade.* Or you end up with a Nimrod project which is so delayed that it is obsolete. Which would be a bit more of a worry than having to wait a couple of years extra for a new jeep.
*Obvously YMMV on whether you think this is a problem but I suggest that if you don’t want a nuclear deterent so very much better not to have paid one.
Reply
Leave a comment