So, a SPN Big Bang author,
gatorgrrrl, thought it would be "the best idea ever" to write a RPS story that takes place in present-day Haiti, in the aftermath of the earthquake. From the summary and the excerpts I've read, it fits into a long history of such fiction, especially in film, as
gabby_silang points out. [ETA 6/16/10: The author has locked her story and
(
Read more... )
I didn't talk about it on my journal. This isn't because I feel like I have no right to and more because I couldn't look at it, and it's my policy that I must understand both sides of a wank situation before I post about it. Just because I am white and American doesn't mean I can't go, 'wow, I think this is just fail', though; however, I can see why it might come across as the white man championing the cause of Justice for the Poor Brown People. It's ... difficult subject material, and the best of intentions can lead you so far down the wrong roads. I honestly do believe that the author of this BB fell into this exact trap.
Re: ficcing about real places/things: I think that finding the balance is extremely difficult, and personal experience in the area/culture/etc. is invaluble. I'm not sure that SPN in particular is the venue for any sort of 'set in other countries with heavy interaction with something other than scenery' fic unless you are VERY skilled because the source material is already so problematically white and entitled.
I honestly kneejerked to India because in my limited knowledge of the country, I find it very interesting. I have a fandom friend that lives there, and I do know that my motivation was to write about India with SPN as a vehicle, not the other way around. But - authorial intent means nothing (or, sometimes, everything) if I can't execute, and in the end I know that I still struggle far too much with racial biases within myself, and Hollywood stereotypes, and white cultural conditioning to do this sort of story even the remotest justice.
Reply
So yeah, I get it.
Reply
In the end I am bettered for this fail, for one. Self-examination ftw.
(sorry, I will stop vomiting all over your thoughtful post, now.)
Reply
Reply
Now, those people genuinely intended to help, they went over with all the best intentions, they thought they had contacts on the ground to steer them through things, they thought they had permission - and they messed it up bigtime.
For me, the very idea of "we're going to take these kids away because it's going to be a chance to get out of this poverty-stricken country" was offensive, not because they wanted to give the kids opportunity, but because the idea was so easily accepted that naturally they'd be better off in America than Haiti. I'm sure that if the parents had been able to send the kids to relatives living in the U.S. they would have done so, but there is a difference between sending your child to live with relations and foreigners coming in to take them away.
That is why this kind of attitude, the attitude displayed in the story, needs to be squashed and squashed hard. No, there's nothing wrong in coming into a country to help after a disaster. Going over there for some kind of poverty tourism, on the other hand...
Reply
Reply
*flails* *points* *gibbers*
Okay, I got nothing more to say here.
Reply
Leave a comment