another note on morals and what may be deemed as Satanic.
As morals on a continuum of point A to point B with Neutrality in the centre - point A fear, evil, negativity, "satan" and Point B love, goodness, positivity, God - where on the spectrum does ones morality go?...
Example: For thousands of years and to this day (in such places as Saudi Arabia) people are stoned to death. In the moment, the people doing the stoning firmly believe in their morals and the one they are throwing rocks and smashing to a bloody, crying, painful, deadly pulp is in their eyes immoral and closer to the side of the "devil" or the A end of the spectrum while they, the stone throwers, consider themselves closer to God or the B side as they are being moral and righteous in their act of stoning the "evil" one.
In my opinion, the stone throwers are closer to "satans" realm or the A side of the spectrum for my morals are that killing someone brutally is an immoral act, while the one being killed in that moment is closer to neutral with nowhere to go. So who is right? People are just following their morals after all.
Remember darkness is not the opposite of light, it is the absence of light.
As morals on a continuum of point A to point B with Neutrality in the centre - point A fear, evil, negativity, "satan" and Point B love, goodness, positivity, God - where on the spectrum does ones morality go?...
Example: For thousands of years and to this day (in such places as Saudi Arabia) people are stoned to death. In the moment, the people doing the stoning firmly believe in their morals and the one they are throwing rocks and smashing to a bloody, crying, painful, deadly pulp is in their eyes immoral and closer to the side of the "devil" or the A end of the spectrum while they, the stone throwers, consider themselves closer to God or the B side as they are being moral and righteous in their act of stoning the "evil" one.
In my opinion, the stone throwers are closer to "satans" realm or the A side of the spectrum for my morals are that killing someone brutally is an immoral act, while the one being killed in that moment is closer to neutral with nowhere to go. So who is right? People are just following their morals after all.
Remember darkness is not the opposite of light, it is the absence of light.
Reply
Leave a comment