\\ \с\
how and why to explain to idiots that international law is different from a wikipedia article ?
The siege is certainly legitimate ... the house where the terrorists are firing from is already a legitimate target ... the former school where the mortars are firing from is not a school anymore . The former hospital where the rockets are coming from is no longer a hospital, although the sign is intact... how can we explain this to millions of idiots?
MJAustenofcourse @Austen12341 per Wikipedia: “According to modern Intl law, blockades are an act of war. They are illegal as part of a war of aggression or when used against a civilian population, instead of a military target. In such case, they are a war crime and potentially a crime against humanity.”