А между тем...
...Европейский суд по правам человека принял решение по делу Игорь Сутягин против Российской Федерации.
Суд единогласно постановил,
что имело место нарушение Конвенции о правах человека в отношении длительности содержания под стражей в ходе расследования;
что имело место нарушение Конвенции о правах человека в отношении длительности процедуры расследования;
что имело место нарушение Конвенции по правам человека в отношении права на независимый и беспристрастный суд...
THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of the length of the applicant’s detention pending investigation and trial;
2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant;
3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in that the trial court was not independent and impartial;
4. Holds that it is not necessary to examine the complaint of a violation of Article 6 § 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the taking of evidence and, in particular, examination of witnesses;
5. Holds that it is not called upon, in the circumstances of the present case, to examine the complaints submitted under Articles 7 and 10 of the Convention.
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 20,000 (twenty thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.
Российская Федерация выплатит Игорю Сутягину 20 тысяч евро, что совсем небольшая сумма за десятилетнее заключение...
Суд единогласно постановил,
что имело место нарушение Конвенции о правах человека в отношении длительности содержания под стражей в ходе расследования;
что имело место нарушение Конвенции о правах человека в отношении длительности процедуры расследования;
что имело место нарушение Конвенции по правам человека в отношении права на независимый и беспристрастный суд...
THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of the length of the applicant’s detention pending investigation and trial;
2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant;
3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in that the trial court was not independent and impartial;
4. Holds that it is not necessary to examine the complaint of a violation of Article 6 § 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention concerning the taking of evidence and, in particular, examination of witnesses;
5. Holds that it is not called upon, in the circumstances of the present case, to examine the complaints submitted under Articles 7 and 10 of the Convention.
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 20,000 (twenty thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.
Российская Федерация выплатит Игорю Сутягину 20 тысяч евро, что совсем небольшая сумма за десятилетнее заключение...