trobadorahas
an interesting post on biphobia in fanfiction that got me thinking:In fanfic, all too frequently characters who have had heterosexual relationships are presented as gay and closeted. (Not bi and closeted.) In fannish squee, slashy subtext is generally welcomed as "gay". It hardly ever seems to allow for bisexuality.
1) This is so not my
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Reply
We can explain bi and lesbian writers erasing women in m/m fic either as biphobia or as misogyny. Do we even need as complicated an explanation for the straight women who may be erasing women in m/m fic? And if I'm erasing men in my m/m, misandry strikes me as a more likely culprit than biphobia (but then I'm the worst person to judge, being me).
Oh definitely misogny in my case. Never felt it was anything more complicated.
Reply
Reply
When I say my motive is misogyny, I don't actually mean I think that is a bad thing. The main root of my 'misogyny' is that I live in a female dominated environment, and I write for escapism, including escapism from being female. So I write male dominated stories from a male POV. So when being slightly flippant with my old mate alixtii I will cheerfully claim that as misogyny, and doubtless he can deconstruct it in radical feminist terms to show aspects that are rooted in genuine societal based female-phobia. I'm not actually claiming to be a female hater though, or not very seriously ( ... )
Reply
Reply
But when I first got into fandom (Buffy), most of what I read was about Xander discovering he is gay and going through that existential angst and forging a relationship with Spike. Lots and lots of We're Not Gay in that segment of the Jossverse and it's a trope I've sincerely come to despise. I find stories now and again that fall into that genre that I enjoy but they are very few and far between. Mostly I find the whole concept very insulting.
One of the things I notice in femslash is that I've rarely come across the We're Not Gay trope there. I hesitate to say it doesn't exist, because, dude, internet huge, but I can't think of a single femslash piece I've read that falls into that category. I wonder why. *muses* I'd love to find some femslash like that for comparison's sake.
Reply
I suppose I could still see the kink-based, non-homophobic (or at least less homophobic) "our love is so great it transcends sexuality" versions of WNG operating in some femslash--I could see it working well in some Buffy/Faith, for example--but as you note, I haven't seen it. (It strikes me that the more OTP-y a pairing is, the more easily I can imagine WNG-ing it. I discuss the relationship between femslash and OTPs here.)
Reply
It's a lot harder to lose femininity, because not only is it a default position but most societies are set up so that masculinity is considered an Important Big Deal but femininity gets much less thought.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Revolutionary Girl Utena, but that series has the most elaborate relationship charts I've ever considered.
Since one of the common tropes of OTP-ism is that all relationships pale in comparison to the OTP, of course Character A's real sexuality can only be that which pairs them with B. Since all relationships with the gender B isn't are by definition lesser, than A can't really be attracted to that gender. It's stupid logic, but that's OTP-ism for you.But in that fervent of OTPism there's also the matter that any relationships the characters have outside the OTP don't matter, no matter the orientation ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment