Stupid Linguistics.
I'm all for classes covering the same bases in the spirit of multiple class integration and synthesis and all that jazz, but by all that's holy, do I really have to hear about the vast and delicate intracacies of wanna-contractions again? This would be the third time I've had to review it for a class. I can repeat it with little thought!
Look! Wanna or gonna can only be used when there's no trace elements between want and to. I wanna kill you is good, Who did I wanna do it is bad, and most Brits don't like either. THE END. NOT WORTH 60 90 180 MINUTES OF CUMULATIVE DISCUSSION OVER FOUR YEARS.
And people wonder why I tune out during lectures and do my Anthropology homework.
Also: Sister bought FF12. Must. Not. Play. Must. Not. Touch. Homework. Papers on guinea pigs. Fanfiction. No Final Fantasy. Noooo! *eyes the Playstation*
Look! Wanna or gonna can only be used when there's no trace elements between want and to. I wanna kill you is good, Who did I wanna do it is bad, and most Brits don't like either. THE END. NOT WORTH 60 90 180 MINUTES OF CUMULATIVE DISCUSSION OVER FOUR YEARS.
And people wonder why I tune out during lectures and do my Anthropology homework.
Also: Sister bought FF12. Must. Not. Play. Must. Not. Touch. Homework. Papers on guinea pigs. Fanfiction. No Final Fantasy. Noooo! *eyes the Playstation*