A low obligation meme

Nov 20, 2007 08:53

Recently there have been a spate of "Reply to this post and I'll tell you 3 things I love about you, then post in your lj" posts, which I haven't replied to since neither part of it appeals to me (consumed as I am with hate and bile. No offense intended to those of you who aren't :)) On the whole I find those "reply to this" posts a bit scary, ( Read more... )

creative genius, meme

Leave a comment

capnoblivious November 20 2007, 00:43:33 UTC
Repeating the above qn:

Would you put up a cheesecake/beefcake calendar at work, and would you object if a colleague did?

(No reason.)

Reply

alias_sqbr November 20 2007, 01:06:16 UTC
I totally would not, ever. For a start, my taste in men is not generally reflected by those sorts of calenders. Also I try not to do things which will bug other people.

As to whether I'd object, well...I probably wouldn't like it that much, but I think it would depend on circumstances and the nature of the calender. (Also I'm pretty passive, so if they didn't respond to me complaining to them would probably just quietly seethe).

For example, my female Phd supervisor had a firemen calender in her office, and they looked really happy and healthy, and the proceeds all went to charity, so it didn't bug me (I can't speak for her male students :)) I don't think I'd mind a female version of that.

Reply

capnoblivious November 20 2007, 02:08:37 UTC
Mm. My colleagues have just put up a fireman calendar, and have said they'd be ok with the female equivalent.

But, I'm not particularly offended, and by and large prefer my Dalek calendar, so it's a non-issue. But it got me thinking. :)

Reply

ataxi November 20 2007, 03:09:15 UTC
No.

How would you improve democracy?

Reply

alias_sqbr November 20 2007, 03:55:03 UTC
You know it's a pity, that's an interesting question but I can't answer it because you POSTED IT IN THE WRONG PLACE. THIS ARE SRS MEME U NO.

Of course the fact that every question poster so far has done this is perhaps a sign I didn't explain it very well....(Or you're being annoying on purpose. Or both. Or neither. Or all of the above!)

Reply

Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... ataxi November 20 2007, 04:11:07 UTC
"Reply to this post (NOT one of the comments, or it'll all get confused) with a question. Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours, as a reply to the comment containing the question. "

I think you explained what we did with great clarity. What you're now talking about, I have absolutely no idea!

Reply

Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... shrydar November 20 2007, 05:06:59 UTC
Reply to this post

That means click the "leave a comment" link at the top of the page. If you've just clicked the "Reply" link under one of the questions, you're replying to that comment, not to the post.

I don't understand what's so unclear about alias_sqbr's instructions.

Reply

Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... ataxi November 20 2007, 05:13:17 UTC
"That means click the "leave a comment" link at the top of the page."

Which I did (see below).

"Then post a separate comment with an answer to the question immediately above yours"

Which I then proceeded to do. My mistake, apparently, was to include a question with my answer. But nobody had said I couldn't!

I don't understand what's so unclear about ataxi's objections.

Reply

Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... alias_sqbr November 20 2007, 05:56:14 UTC
You're absolutely right. *edits post*

Reply

Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... ataxi November 20 2007, 06:09:44 UTC
Huzzah! It's a win for pointless bureaucratic nonsense.

Reply

Re: Either the wind is not southerly, or I'm not really looking at a hawk and a handsaw ... alias_sqbr November 20 2007, 07:07:50 UTC
And when pointless bureaucratic nonsense wins, everybody wins.

Reply

ataxi November 20 2007, 04:35:01 UTC
So, how would you improve democracy?

Reply

shrydar November 20 2007, 05:31:37 UTC
Only if I knew it wouldn't make anyone else uncomfortable, so no.

I would not object on my own behalf, but I would support (and probably even anticipate) the objections of others.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up