General meta about fanworks tends to be written by fanfic writers(*), and I often get a squidgy feeling of "that's not right" when I try and apply their conclusions/assumptions to fanart. Unfortunately I suck at this sort of sociological analysis so this is just some vague impressions, please let me know if your experience is different
(
Read more... )
Pictures might be worth a thousand words, but those words are purely descriptive, not prescriptive. :)
Reply
Reply
I suppose to put it in the old terms of show vs tell, literature can both show and tell, whereas pictures can only show. The 'telling' bit is where I think authors balk at the use of their work.
Reply
I guess that's true, though in my opinion art can be pretty unambiguous and didactic, and captures a lot of character and motivation with expression and mood etc. I think my "But they wouldn't DO that!" emotional reaction is about equally strong for both, especially since fanart often comes with titles and notes that "tell" anyway. But this is about other people's emotional reactions, and you may be right.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment